🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the UK, and it appears it’s time for a reassessment. Throughout its history, an observance that began as a festivity and recollection of heritage, traditions and links between Black populations worldwide, has developed a business-like atmosphere, broadening to incorporate functions where African descendants are paid to speak with white audiences about “unconscious bias” and active solidarity. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s generated a rise in the enterprise of showcasing anti-racist commitment. But even that moment has passed. The surge has crested, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what raising awareness is for.

The History of Black History Observance

Initially celebrated in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with seven days of celebration and reflection in the second week of February. Black History Month evolved from this movement and was officially launched in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the US and Canada in the second month, but also in October in the United Kingdom, the Federal Republic of Germany, Ireland and the Holland.

The period has evolved since that time, focusing less on the histories of the slave trade across the Atlantic and civil rights battles, and greater focus on prominent Black figures in politics, culture, and activism, and extensively acknowledging the impact Black people have made to mold society. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with lectures and artistic activities. But the manner the month is celebrated is a manifestation of the political moment. How it progresses is a valuable example in how co-option leads to dismantling: the reshaping of Black History Month has impeded the purpose of it, which is to confront embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Troubling Time

Few things illustrate how important it is to reevaluate Black History Month as much as the current time in which it takes place this year. In the United Kingdom, a reemerging right-wing in the form of the Reform political group is ahead in surveys. In the warmer months we saw the biggest extreme right demonstration in the UK's past. a prominent political figure, the person of color at the helm of the Tory party, is a strong critic of the racial justice movement, and we are in a position where a elected representative gains confidence to state that “not seeing any white faces” in certain urban areas is a cause for alarm. Simultaneously, far-right parties are growing in Europe as a entirety.

In the US, a colossal assault against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been brought, frequently with success, to the top legal institutions of the state. A effort to erase the history of people of color and narrative from the historical documents is ongoing. One of the former president's initial presidential directives targeted the museum of African American legacy, and the prestigious establishment, accusing them of a coordinated and broad attempt to rewrite our Nation’s history” by depicting the United States “as inherently racist”.

In this context, the observance illustrates how insufficiently it can be impactful if it is restricted to either dutiful corporate observances, or stripped of political content festivities of contributions in the past, rather than confronting the situation of the present. It also reveals how its limited duration means that it is separated from the broader ongoing work that is needed. A university professor, a professor at an educational institution, expressed it perfectly when she raised concerns about the fleeting superficial actions of the month. “The problem with taking a tokenistic approach”, she stated, “is that it often means that Black History Month turns into a brief show rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Figuring out how to alter, change and broaden initiatives for racial equality and recognition in such moments of dejection and worry is a challenging endeavor. There is a inclination to just eliminate observances such as Black History Month entirely, thinking they are no longer suitable, or are vestiges of an time that has not worked.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and tradition of activism for racial justice – community-based BLM initiatives, inclusion and equity efforts, and certainly, even commercial engagements – constitute an framework that a considerable labor has been dedicated to. It is there not just to decay as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, regresses), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month seem? To begin with, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is dispersed throughout the annual calendar (as some institutions are already commencing), elements of its material (particularly around notable African descendants) incorporated into academic syllabi. It would also be a period that does not evade governmental matters, and allows opportunity for citizens, particularly youth, to express their concerns and stories. What use is simple recognition of the bygone era when it ignores the contemporary truth of extreme conservative demonstrations in the urban areas? Organizations who mark it should not be reassured with the non-confrontational words of hidden discrimination and awareness of subtle slights, but faced with the dangers that impact society if opposition to discrimination is not treated with importance. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made current, critical, and adaptive. Maybe an total re-identification is necessary – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.